Google Analytics is great, but needs to be configured correctly. Once that happens, you’ll quickly find that having custom dashboards and reports are imperative to the platform displaying you the right information in an easy, highly-valuable view that you can digest efficiently. We’ve grabbed our dashboards from many sources, and went on to tweak and tune – well, the time has come to give up some of that work, so here we are! Let us know what you think in the comments, and feel free to ask questions if you need help creating your own.

What We’ve Included for You

Download the Dashboards

If you are already a subscriber and have logged in, you should see some great content below. If not, please login or share to view the download/installation links.

Adwords Branded Vs. Non-Branded Performance

Geared at eCommerce or Sites that assign a fiscal value to tracked goals, this will quickly let you see if you are spending approriately on branded and non-branded keywords, and help you to identify inefficiencies in your Adwords campaigns.

Install This Dashboard

 Adwords Performance

This dashboard allows you to see how much return you are getting on the money you invest into Adwords campaigns. You can see your own expenses and revenue within your Google Adwords account, and see exactly where and how your monetary investment is working for you.

Install This Dashboard

eCommerce SEO

Geared at eCommerce or Sites that assign a fiscal value to tracked goals, this will let you easily see what keywords are driving traffic, conversions, and sales from organic channels.

Install This Dashboard

 Facts About Visitors

Simply put, this dashboard is all about user demographics to the deepest extent that GA allows under their new privacy policy. Compare performance of your content across multiple locations and funnels.

Install This Dashboard

 Sales Cockpit

Traffic, top products, sales, and conversion rates are the name of the game in this sales-centric dashboard. If you sell anything and need a 15sec ‘snapshot’ of what’s going on, try it out.

Install This Dashboard

SEO

Aimed solely at those concerned with Organic performance (and you all should be), with a little tweaking this is a great one to grab and customize to be your daily ‘go-to’.

Install This Dashboard

Social Media

See Data Hub activity and get insights into what social networks are sending you the most traffic. This Social Media dashboard is a good place to start when you have limited time to throw at socializing, and need to maximize opportunities you may have otherwise missed.

Install This Dashboard

Personal Blogger

My personal favorite, this dashobaord is set-up to show you where the weak and strong spots are in your content strategy. What is working for you? What needs some tweaking? How is your content being viewed – are mobile users passing you by?

Install This Dashboard

How to set-up custom Google Analytics Dashboards:

Setting up custom Google Analytics Dashboards is easy; to install ours, simply click on the links, select the correct profile, and then be sure to edit EVERY WIDGET to ensure that things like keyword filters include the appropriate terms for your brand. If you have any trouble, comment on this post and we’ll be happy to respond!

Custom Google Analytics Dashboards take quite a while to set-up. We hope you understand that by (hopefully) encouraging you to share this page or become a subscriber you are helping us justify creating, aggregating, and sharing great tools like these…
Please Log In or Register if you prefer not to share this page.

Trust is an issue approached and researched every year in the Edelman Trust Barometer and it’s one report that never goes unread in this office. To truly understand how to communicate with people and (WARNING: bottom line truth coming up) convince them to do business with our clients, it is imperative that we, as marketers, understand where people’s trust lies and what truly impacts those feelings.

How To Build Customer Trust

This year in their report, Edelman included a wonderful list of attributes that establish and build trust between an organization and its constituents. That list looks something like this:

Let’s explore those attributes of trust and see if we can’t find some areas for improvement.

Engagement

So what do people think about when they look to trust a company? Engagement and transparency may be buzzwords in the industry, but they got there by being important to people who spend money. Things like whether or not a company listens to customer feedback, whether or not they treat their employees well, how apparent it is that profits come before customers and the frequency and honesty of public conversations are the main driving points for engagement that dictate trust.

Most of these are quickly dismissed by companies, which is unfortunate because these are not only the most important issues for customers, but also the ones that are mostly handled incorrectly across all industries. Sure, it’s easy to say “We consistently get good responses in our customer feedback surveys,” or “Our employees don’t hate us,” or “We have a sign that reads ‘The Customer is Always Right’,” but the real tough work comes into play when you have to take a hard look at your corporate culture and value proposition to see if you’re truly listening to customer feedback instead of just taking it, and really asking what your employees would change about their working conditions if they could, or taking a stand on an issue that may lose you money because it’s the right thing to do for your customers.

That’s where trust is built. Where do you land when it really comes to trustworthy engagement with your audience?

Consider This: When was the last time a service, product or company update was used from a customer complaint/suggestion? What about an employee complaint/suggestion? Try working in some “behind the curtains” posts when you’re planning out your next round of social updates, even if it makes your skin crawl to be that open in a public forum.

Integrity

This is one of those truths that are self-evident: the more likely people feel your company has and acts with integrity, the more likely they are to trust you. I’ve read my share of Arthur Conan Doyle, but you don’t have to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce that correlation.

If your company operates with ethical business practices, if you accept responsibility for your actions and communicate with transparency, according to Edelman (and everyone else with common sense) your customers will be likely to trust you. This is another bundle of things every company knows, but knowing it and doing it can sometimes be world’s apart. Honestly, how much easier is it to try and skirt an issue or deny blame for a mistake than publicly stating “We know what happened was unfortunate and it was a mistake. We are sorry”? People are much more forgiving that we tend to give them credit for and if Lance Armstrong, Kobe Bryant and Milli Vanilli have taught us anything, it’s that dragging out a lie looks a whole lot worse than simply apologizing and learning from a mistake.

Businesses and CEOs have a lot of ground to cover when it comes to gaining back trust. Simply stating that you have ethical business practices won’t cut it anymore. In a world where everything is public and everything can be broadcasted, your customers need a little more convincing.

Consider This: Take a look at your crisis communication plan (this is assuming your company has one). If step one isn’t ”Apologize for the Mistake”, you might want to think about revising it. Find a place in the beginning of your policy to include the Three As of a corporate crisis: Acknowledge, Apologize, Act.

Products & Services

At first glance, this might seem like a strange addition to the list. Even more strange that it’s in the middle and not a tack-on afterthought, but when it really comes down to it, this may be one of the most important areas to pay attention to when trying to build customer trust within your target markets. Before social media and online communications, the first two aspects of this list almost didn’t exist. Sure, you had TV commercials, radio ads, magazine placements and the like, but very few people truly trusted those as faithful representations of how a company actually was. Trust was built almost entirely by the quality of your merchandise and the effectiveness of your services. We’ve kind of drifted away from that type of thinking in recent years; which is why my grandparents washing machine is still going strong and I’m almost on the last leg of the one I bought myself not 8 years ago.

It’s imperative that you spend the time to create products that solve problems and, here’s the kicker, actually do what you’ll say they’ll do. The same sentiment also goes for the services you provide. Edelman also points out that whether or not you’re perceived as an innovator of new products, services and ideas plays a part in building trust. When you are seen as a thought leader, risk taker, and industry driver, people let down their guards a bit and trust you know what yo’re doing (it also helps if you occasionally succeed due to actually knowing what you’re doing).

Consider This: At the last new product/service planning meeting, was the phrase “We can probably leave that out. It’s expensive and the customers might not even notice” ever uttered? If it was, start approaching problems more from the angle of “what will solve and exceed ALL of my customers’ needs with this particular issue” as opposed to “what can we leave out to have this launch next week”? Everyone remembers being disappointed as a child after begging for something you saw in a TV commercial only to find out the Teenage Ninja Turtle Sewer Set broke after once use and wasn’t big enough for your toys to fit in and play. Don’t be the Teenage Ninja Turtles Sewer Set.

Purpose

This one could just as easily be labelled “Social Accountability.” All of the elements listed by Edelman for this section revolve around programs to help the local communities, steps to protect the environment, addressing societal needs, and working with non-profits, so it would appear that stepping outside of the corporate walls to show empathy and compassion in the world around you makes a difference to people who want to give you money.

A lot of times, things that encompass a company’s purpose are encapsulated within it’s Vision Statement or Mission Statement. Having said that, the fact that outreach is mentioned in a Vision/Mission Statement nohow guarantees that it will be implemented or carried out.

Consider This: Try setting up a monthly charity or cause that your company can support in the local community. Take a Saturday and have the team (or a department at a time) build houses with Habitat for Humanity or find a Charitable Fun Run to do as a group. Also, there are a lot of holiday opportunities with Goodwill and Secret Santa organizations. It sounds mean to say “be charitable to gain customer trust,” because you should honestly be charitable because it’s the right thing to do, but that doesn’t always motivate every CEO.

Operations

Are your executives known and liked? Do you consistently bring in earnings for investors? Are you Nationally or Internationally ranked for something? If the answer to these questions are “yes” then you pretty much have this area buttoned up. While not every company can simply “get Internationally ranked as a world leading company,” there are definitely some organizations or awards within your niche that you can aspire towards.

Your executives don’t have to make a huge gestures, sometimes all it takes is noticing something in the community and taking time to appreciate it. Again, this is hinging on the possibility of sounding overly in support of disingenuous actions and that’s not my point. My point is that if systems are built into the fabric of your organization that allow for transparency and success to be noticed, you will be in a prime position to built trust within your customer base and trust can correspond to a happy bottom line.

Consider This: Are the only times stakeholders are thought of during Stakeholder Planning Meetings? Is your CEO well-known in the community or a hobbit-like recluse, hiding in his mansion calling into the night for his lost sled? If you have a blog, that’s a great way to get your CEO’s voice out into the world and working to increase the bottom line for investors will always make people happy.

Conclusion

We’ve been on a journey today, but I hope that you trusted me that we were talking about something important. It’s important that your customers trust you so they feel comfortable giving you their money. It’s important for companies to understand what aspects make up those elements of trust for customers in order to align business actions and objectives with them in mutually beneficial ways. It’s also important to realize that we all have jobs to do, and we all have to trust and rely on someone to make sure things run smoothly.

How important do you think trust in in your industry? Is there an industry or service where trust doesn’t really play into the equation? I’m interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.

Is Facebook on a mission to improve user experience, or on a quest to validate every privacy concern your kid’s school counselor warned you about? On Jan. 16^th, 2013, Mark Zuckerberg introduced the Facebook Social Graph Search, and to many appears to have taken an early lead in driving a dangerous trend.

 ”Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage’s whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men.”

-Ayn Rand

That may sounds like a rash generalization (I don’t normally jump straight to the Ayn Rand quotes when I’m researching things), but Zuckerberg’s take may actually validate this when he talks about what he believes people care about:

“A squirrel dying in front of your house may be more relevant to your interests right now than people dying in Africa.”

-Mark Zuckerberg

What Is Facebook Graph Search?

Facebook’s “Social Graph Search” will allow users to search the Facebook user database for individuals, brands and content based on data points such as:

• Interests
• Photos
• Places visited
• Likes
• Physical location
• Etc.

At this point, the Facebook Social Graph Search won’t search status updates, but it’s no doubt in the long term plan, if you take Mark’s word on it:

“Our goal is not to build a platform; it’s to be across all of them.”

-Mark Zuckerberg

To Search or To Facebook Graph Search?

In addition to this change, which is aimed at encouraging users to stay longer on the Facebook website, integration with Bing appears to have deepened, judging by their beta and Bing recently adding 5x more social data into their search sidebar. When results are not found within your network or shared publicly, the ‘fallback’ is for Facebook to display relevant results through their search partner, Bing. Inevitably, some users will begin searching for general information through the Facebook search bar as they become conditioned to search within the platform, which I’m willing to be Zuckerberg wouldn’t be upset about.

With any new Facebook change there’s a period of necessary trial and error, but if the beta test proves to be a working platform, Zuckerberg may have finally found a way to liven up the network’s current (and pretty useless) search bar. By integrating a more natural search, Facebook can entice more people to spend more time on the site, which already dominates a lot of Internet time as it is, thereby encouraging investors and the stock market gnomes that Facebook isn’t a waste of time after all.

Whether this search enhances the status of social media civilization or demolishes it is up to be seen, as Facebook has made very clear that privacy issues were taken into consideration from the very beginning.

What Does Graph Search Mean for Marketers?

Right off the bat, Facebook profile, page and picture optimization, as well as optimization of websites for Bing spiders just became a top priority. This implies a growing need for leveraging metrics available from Microsoft and Facebook revolving rankings, profile ‘completeness’, network size, and respective rankings in results. It also means a need to go back in a start labeling and taggin all photos and video content with locations, company, and people names in order for them to show up in the new search.

For example, if someone uses the new Graph Search to find “Friends who went to the ISM Holiday Mixer” it won’t do any good unless all of those videos and pictures are tagged with that particular event, the ISM brand and the people in those photos are tagged correctly. It’s adds a few more steps into the mix when it comes to (and I hesitate to use this term, but what the heck) Facebook SEO, but those steps are now glaringly necessary.

Aside from just making Facebook changes, if you’re not using Bing’s Webmaster tool set yet, you probably want to set that up immediately considering all Facebook default searches will now run through Bing.

The Bigger Search Picture

All in all, these changes speak to a greater message many of us have anticipated and preached for years: social media’s growing importance in search. While we don’t believe Facebook’s Graph Search is a complete ‘game changer’, we do believe that it will likely drive more search equity towards FB/Bing and we would be remiss if we didn’t step up and be well-prepared and positioned to take advantage of whatever shifts come over the next few years.

As marketers, it is our job to stay on top of updates and announcements like this and while concrete data and extrapolations can’t materialize until widespread release of Graph Search, it appears at this point Facebook may be extending it’s hand into a profitable and influential arena. Whether or not Facebook users or the general public feel privacy is going out of the window, this new land of search is here to stay.

What do you think of Facebook’s Graph Search? Do you think it’s a “game changer” or just another addition to the network people will ignore to watch cat videos?

Thoughts?

Let me apologize in advance for the transcript’s front and end missing. I will be sure to update when it becomes available, but was limited to the failures of the FTC live stream. The core message is 100% in-tact, from the intro to the last statement prior to questions…

…OTHER PARTIES, INTERVIEWED NUMEROUS INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS AND TOOK SWORN TESTIMONY OF KEY GOOGLE EXECUTIVES.

“There are two aspects to the settlement we announced today. The first involves Google’s misuse of patent protection to prevent competition. We stopped that abuse. The second concerns allegations that Google unfairly biases its search results. We closed this investigation finding the evidence does not support a claim that Google’s prominent display of its own content on its general search page was undertaken without legitimate justification. We do accept Google’s legally binding commitments to stop the most problematic business practices relating to search in search advertising. This also comes with monitoring obligations as well.

Let me start with the patent issue. By a 4-1 vote, a bipartisan majority of the commission orders Google to stop seeking to exclude competitors using standard essential patents that Motorola, which Google purchased, had first promised but refused to license unfair and reasonable terms. These essential patents and others like them are the cornerstone of the system of interopen — interoperability standards that we have taken for granted. Over half of American consumers own and use one of these devices, including iPhones, Android phones and Xboxes. Today’s action by the commission ensures that competition ensures to work for the benefit of American consumers in these important markets.

Now, years ago Motorola promised to license its patents essential to these interoperability patents on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms. Those are called fran terms, to any interested manufacturer. Other companies took Motorola at its word. Over many years relying on this promise, they invested billions and probably tens of billions of dollars in developing and bringing products to consumers using these patents. Rather than offering a license or the license it promised, Motorola changed the rules of the game. The company sought injunctions and exclusion orders to prevent the devices from coming into the country against products using their patents. After Google purchased Motorola, it inherited this litigation and continued the same practices. Google’s un-fair conduct threatened  laptop and tablet computers and smart phone and gaming systems or it could have increased the cost of these products by requiring manufacturers to pay higher licensing fees which then would have been passed onto consumers.

Here’s an example of one product issue in the case. It’s an iPad. I happened to have an older one. There are a number of other devices, xboxes, government-issued Research in Motion smart phones, that are all under threat if this practice had been allowed to continue and grow. Google’s settlement with the commission requires to Google to abandon their claim for relief on any essential patents with a fran commitment and offer a license on fran terms to any company that wants to license these patents in the future.

Today’s landmark enforcement action will become, we hope, a template for resolution of SEP licensing disputes across many industries and builds on more than 15 years of bipartisan work in the Federal Trade Commission from patent reports, to workshops, to enforcement actions like this one aimed at protecting the integrity of the patent system and even more importantly, protecting American consumers. Today’s action makes clear the commitments to make patents available on reasonable terms matters and that companies cannot make these commitments when it suits them, and to have a patent included in one standard and behave differently later once the standard is in place makes those relying on it vulnerable to extortion. Today’s commitment action will relieve companies of hoarding patents for defensive purposes, savings we hope that can be invested in job creation, research, and development.

Before we turn to the commission’s investigation of Google’s search and search advertising practices, let me say a few words about the commission’s section 5 authority, which was the statutory basis for our challenge to Google’s unfair conduct.

When Congress created this agency in 1914, 99 years ago, it endowed the commission with a unique commission of broad jurisdiction and limited remedies. Our section 5 authority reaches beyond the antitrust laws to prohibit unfair methods of competition. In lies a pennumbra. We can impose fines. We don’t put malefactors in jail. Section 5 violations are not violations of the antitrust laws and are not a basis for subsequent follow-up private lawsuits for treble damages in Federal court. In a society that many believe is overly litigious, the judicial use of section 5 represents a practical way for the commission to bring problematic conduct to a halt.

In the second part of the action, Google committed to stopping the most troubling of its business practices related to Internet search into search advertising. Google will stop misappropriating or scraping the content of its rivals for use of its own specialized search results. Google will drop contractual restrictions that impair the ability of small businesses particularly to advertise on competing search advertising platforms. Google has made legally enforceable and binding commitments to resolve the commission’s concerns. These commitments have reporting requirements that will allow the commission to vigorously monitor and enforce compliance if necessary.

Let me talk in a little more detail about some of this conduct.

The commission investigated allegations that Google misappropriated without consent the content of rivals websites to improve its own products and pass this content off to consumer as if it were its own. For example, Google allegedly scraped the user-generated reviews of local restaurants displayed on yelp and led consumers to believe that they were its own. When some websites complained to Google about the practice, Google allegedly — and I say allegedly — threatened to remove them entirely from Google search results. Now, Congress created our commission almost 100 years ago to stop unfair business practices and I won’t seek to characterize Google’s behavior as conduct that is clearly problematic and potentially harmful to competition because it undermines incentives to innervate. That is why you would create a new site for restaurant reviews if someone else can take them and appropriate them as if they were their own.

Going forward, Google will allow websites the ability to opt out of Google local or product shopping without being penalized or demoting in its general search results on Google.com. That is it’s organic search. This arrangement should ensure that the Internet remains vibrant and competitive.

The commission also investigated whether Google unfairly restricted the ability of businesses to use tools to manage their advertising campaigns simultaneously on Google and on other competing advertising platforms. For example, Bing. This practice is known as multi-homing. Our investigation suggested that most large advertisers preferred to multi-home. Multi-homing by small advertising and small businesses affected by the Google restrictions was much less common. Some commissioners were concerned by the tendency of Google’s restrictions to raise the cost to small business and Google has committed to drop the restrictions on multi-homing. We think that will create a more competitive environment.

Many of Google’s critics, including many competitors, wanted the commission to go further in this investigation and regulate the intricacies of Google’s search engine algorithm. The commission exhaustively investigated allegations that Google unfairly manipulated search engine results to harm competitors, a practice that most of us refer to as search bias. Today the commission has voted to close this investigation unanimously. It can always, of course, reopen any investigation if it believes that a company, in this case Google, crosses the line with respect to our investigation. Although some evidence suggested that Google was trying to eliminate competition. Google’s primary reason for changing the look and feel of its search results to highlight its own products was to improve the user experience. Similarly changes to Google’s algorithm that had the effective demoting certain competing websites had connection, applausable connection, with improving Google search results, especially when competitors tried to gain Google’s algorithm in ways that benefitted those firms but not consumers looking for the best search results.

I remember an article from the New York Times maybe a year ago about J.C. Penney paying companies to do precisely this: not commenting on the value of seeing J.C. Penney advertisements ranked higher or lower in search results. Tellingly, Google’s search engine rivals engaged in many of the same product design choices that Google did, suggesting that this practice can benefit consumers.

Now, while not everything that Google did was beneficial on balance, we didn’t believe that the evidence supported an FTC challenge to this aspect of Google’s business under American law. As Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote more than 50 years ago and as the Federal courts have consistently ruled since, “the focus of our law is on protecting competition, not competitors.”

Google is unquestionably one of America’s great companies, innovative in fielding from its core search engine to varied ventures such as driverless cars. With today’s action by the FTC, Google can refocus on its business and its products, but with a clear understanding that it must do so while competing fairly. Now, some may believe the commission should have done more in this case perhaps because they’re locked in hand to hand combat with Google around the world or perhaps in a mistaken belief that criticizing us will influence the outcome in other jurisdictions. Some may believe we should have done less. I imagine Google is one that believes that. but for our part, at this very wonderful agency, we follow the facts where they lead  and apply statute faithfully. We do it with a vigor and appropriate restraint.

Today’s bipartisan commission action brings to an end the commission’s investigations of Google in a fashion calculated to brings our investigation to a close.”

What: You’ve been to BarCamp, you’ve been to Techville, you’ve been to Nashcocktail and you’re a valued member of the Nashville digital community (NAMA, PRSA, Digital Nashville, you name it) and this holiday industry party is for you! ISM will be hosting an Industry Collective Holiday Mixer on December 13, 2012 at Cabana in Hillsboro Village and we want to send 2012 out with a bang. Due to a private party beforehand and space being limited, reservations will be on a first come, first served basis for the first 150 people, but please feel free to use this courtesy RSVP page so we can keep an eye out for you*.

2013 will bring with it amazing change, but first we want to honor what a great year we all had as a marketing communications tech community in the greatest city in the world, so come prepared for good food, lots of drinks and great peeps on December 13. Come over after the NAMA event and get ready to embrace the change that will be 13.

Your first drink is on us!

Who: This is a gathering of companies, agencies, freelancers and all-around practitioners within the Nashville Digital Community who want to get together and throw a great party.

When: Doors open at 9 and space will be limited to the first 150 people.

About Industry Collective: Industry Collective is a group of Nashville-based creative, marketing, social media, technology and interactive professionals who come together to validate/shape/kill ideas amongst their peers and gather to strengthen the Nashville marketing communications technology community. The Collective was formed to make the connections necessary to produce great work.

*RSVP-ing does not guarantee a spot at the Industry Collective Holiday Mixer.

Pretty moving, but we all know how it ends. Jerry gets fired, brings Bridget Jones with him, argues with Cuba Gooding Jr., falls in love and re-establishes his proficiency in his field using the philosophy he mandated at the beginning. Happy endings all around.

Sure, I doubt many of us are high-level sports agents and therefore may not relate to Jerry’s epiphany and I fully plan on relating this to your business and your brand stories (retail, industrial, B2B, whatever), but first let me tell you another story.

Starbucks and the External Internal Memo

In 2006, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz spent some months auditing the Starbucks franchises and came to some unsettling conclusions. He felt that the Starbucks experience had become “too commoditized” and was distancing itself from their original vision and purpose. He made his concerns known to his internal leadership team in a memo.

He told them of his feelings by saying things like:

“Over the past ten years, in order to achieve the growth, development, and scale necessary…we have had to make a series of decisions that, in retrospect, have lead to the watering down of the Starbucks experience, and, what some might call the commoditization of our brand.”

and

“Many of [the] decisions were probably right at the time, and on their own merit would not have created the dilution of the experience; but in this case, the sum is much greater and, unfortunately, much more damaging than the individual pieces.”

He goes on to explain how the choice to move to better espresso machines was a smart economic move, but the height of the new machines cut off the barista from the customer, thereby removing “much of the romance and theatre that was in play” in the stores; and how the need for fresh-roast coffee in every international market required flavor-locked packaging that no longer allowing baristas to scoop and grind the beans, which in turn eliminated the natural aroma expected in the stores, “the most powerful non-verbal signal… in [the] stores.” Schultz then moves to the streamlining of the stores’ design, a necessity based on store ROI, but how the branches inadvertently lost their neighborhood feels and came off as “sterile, cookie cutter, no longer reflecting the passion [the] partners feel about [Starbucks] coffee.”

He ended the memo saying:

“I have provided you with a list of some of the underlying issues that I believe we need to solve, let me say at the outset that we have all been part of these decisions. I take full responsibility myself, but we desperately need to look into the mirror and realize it’s time to get back to the core and make the changes necessary to evoke the heritage, the tradition, and the passion that we all have for the true Starbucks experience.”

It is a very powerful and emotional memo and I’ve used quite a few direct quotes from it already. The interesting thing about this though is that it was an internal memo, never meant to see the light of day or grace any eyes besides those of Mr. Schultz and his top 12 executive team members.

It was leaked and picked up by the fan blog Starbucks Gossip and within days had spread to the likes of the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and many more.

This event noted a turning point for Starbucks. No longer could they hide behind their size and distance from the consumer. Thanks to social channels, everyone now knew that Starbucks was aware of their issues, leaving them no choice but to act and actually do something about them.

In an interview following the leak, Schultz said the public reaction was a wake-up call for him.

“Stunned as I was that the memo had leaked, I was also astonished by the depth of conversation it unleashed, as well as the speed…The heated online conversations about the memo were beyond Starbucks’ influence, more so than any other controversy we had experienced…Starbucks had no interactive presence online. No way to speak up quickly on our own behalf, to talk directly to customers, investors, as well as partners, or let them talk directly to us…we were losing control of our own story.”

Unlike Maguire, Schultz never meant for other people to see his thoughts and feelings, but that doesn’t change the fact that he wrote his own Maguire Manifesto, the honest document that broke down walls and changed the course of a brand and an industry.

Controlling Brand Stories & The Maguire Manifesto

Jerry Maguire learned the hard way that revolutionary thinking will be met with backlash, and Howard Schultz learned the hard way that nothing in this world is truly confidential anymore. It is the responsibility (not to mention, the necessity) of all brands to take steps towards owning their brand stories. Whether they be the strategically-branded stories created and distributed by companies themselves or the ones curated and fostered by online communities, brand stories and their ownership are vital parts of the business world now.

To get to that point of understanding and owning your own brand stories, you need to write your own Maguire Manifesto. What areas are stagnating in your industry/business/brand/office and what steps are needed to get back to that transparency that truly connects your company with the people it serves? When was the last time you mapped out all the influencers and advocates that stand up for you when you’re not standing up for yourself? Do you know where they live online? Are you creating and curating brand stories that provoke further conversation, and, maybe more importantly, do you know how those conversations fit into your overall marketing strategy and further your business’ goals?

No longer can these Statements of Realization be kept private. Everything eventually gets out. But honestly, why would you want those statements to be kept under lock and key? By releasing them to the very people you’re desiring to connect with, you allow them to hold you accountable to your mission (like the Starbucks community and Howard Schultz) and bring them into your the brand story that you are controlling. No more catch-up playing, no more controversy, just conversation.

This is a big step for a lot of companies and the progression from the walled garden into the town square can be a rough one. It’s important to have the proper guidance and a team that can manage those connections and lead you to where you want to be as an organization that plans on lasting 10, 20, 100 more years. We are entering the days where Connection Planning and Management is going to overtake Channel Planning and Management and your Maguire Manifesto will help lead you into that new dawn.

Carbonated Conversations

Recently I was very impressed with Coca-Cola because of their take on the Maguire Manifesto. Not only did they externalize an internal company conversation, but they animated it and actively shared it on Youtube. The fully disclose their marketing and content strategies as well as explain their thinking and why these changes are important to them. It’s like Jerry Maguire times 1,000.

Take a look. Here’s part one of their two-part Maguire Manifesto:

Coca-Cola is leading the way with their efforts in social media and this manifesto just promotes their efforts further, bringing their advocates and fans deeper into the conversation about their conversations (how meta!) and changing fans’ opinions of just how Coca-Cola fits into their lives. It’s an impressive step and one that should be emulated throughout all industries.

Are you inspired?

Have you already begun writing out your Maguire Manifesto in your head?

Or perhaps there are things standing in your way that seem insurmountable, problems that don’t seem to have a solution or walls that can’t come down.

Jerry Maguire had a box of belongings, a love-struck secretary and a pompous second-rate wide receiver and he still found a way. Howard Schultz had the eyes of a nation focused on the company he loved and the minds of his customers thinking the Starbucks brand was crumbling and he still found a way. Coca-Cola was coming from over 130 years of tradition and a world that viewed them a certain way and they found a way as well.

Maybe you just need help.

Their ways started with their Maguire Manifestos, so maybe you should start there too.

Thoughts?

Google has a reputation for rolling out far-reaching changes at a moment’s notice. Today, it was announced that Google is merging its Google Places pages with their new Google+ Local initiative. While this move adds benefits and options for consumers and G+ users, it creates a lot of new potential challenges for Google Places Page and Google+ Business Page administrators.

Here’s what you need to know:

Optimization of G+ is Even More important Now

While you can still manage your Google Places page from your previous administrator access, the page information is now being cultivated and merged with your Google+ Business Page and will live in the new Google+ Local tab.

You business pages will still show up in search results (and have been integrated with Maps and mobile too), but now the information that shows will be the rich content that has been written and optimized for your Google+ Business Page.

This makes it even more important that you’ve taken the necessary steps to completely optimize your G+ page (if you’re unsure how to do that, read our post on optimizing G+ personal pages). There isn’t a business on the planet that can afford to not have an updated, optimized Google+ Business Page now as search results and business rankings will be shifting in the wake of Google’s 80-million-page shift.

A Fully-Realized Enterprise Social Strategy and Social Media Policy Are No Longer Optional

It wasn’t that long ago that having an enterprise social strategy was something you’d find in companies few and far between, but those times have changed. With every change to Google and Facebook’s growing empires, it has become necessary to delve into and understand how your company appears for, acts with and responds to customers on social media.

With the recent merger of Google Places and Google+ Local, customers now have the ability to interact and converse directly on Google+ Business Pages alongside leaving reviews. In the past, it was easy to keep an eye on reviews and respond when necessary, but the conversation is moving away from stagnant review slots and we are in the midst of Google realizing their vision – a completely social experience for the consumer.

Because of Google’s recent changes to 80 million pages, having a clear, set and understood social media policy has just become a top priority for companies.

It’s worth reminding you that unless your customers are prompted to write a review, the review they’re most likely to leave will happen after they have a bad experience. Unlike the Lowe’s Facebook fiasco last year, we hope you’ll be ready to reply with the right response.

One Profile, Several Search Experiences

Your customers will now be able to search out your business in many different ways: by searching on Google.com, searching on Google Maps, through mobile applications and now through searches on Google+ and Google+ Local. You can see how businesses show up in Google Map searches in the image below:

Although there are many doorways through which your customers can now find you, all the information is coming from your one G+ Profile. Users will be able to filter by location, type, Circles, ratings (Zagat-based ratings as well as reviews), and more, so having a fleshed-out and content-rich profile is critical.

Google+ Business profiles allow for much more information and rich content like pictures and videos to be added and easily displayed to customers and search engines. Below, see the different between the old Google Places page layout and the updated Google+ Business page layout.

It’s up to you to take the time and fully optimize this page to give people searching their area the best presentation of your company as possible.

New Pages Are Indexed

One of the most exciting changes coming along with this shift for business concerned with SEO is that unlike Google Places pages, Google+ Local pages will be indexed, so all that work you’re putting into optimizing your page will pay off in your company’s search ranking positioning.

The good news is that aside from spending more time setting up an enterprise social media policy and filling out your Google+ Local page information, managing your Google Places/+ page won’t involve a huge learning curve. Here’s that Google had to say about it in their blog:

“If you are a business owner, you should continue to manage your information in Google Places for Business. You’ll still be able to verify your basic listing data, make updates, and respond to reviews. For those who use AdWords Express, your ads will operate as normal as they’ll automatically redirect people to the destination you selected, or your current listing.”

Yes, there are greater demands on business-owners on learning Google+, but much is being focused for businesses while search option are expanding for customers searching you out.

No More Stars, Zagat Now Rules To Roost 

Last year Google acquired Zagat. No one was really sure how it would play out, but now we’re getting a peak into how this will solidify for businesses and consumers.

Google has done away with their 5-star review rating process and merged everything with Zagat’s 30-point score system. The same is true for general reviews and both will show up in search rankings for businesses on Google.com AND Google+ Local searches.

While for a lot of B2B businesses this may not seem like that big a deal, with all reviews now showing up in search rankings throughout all Google services, it is even more important that you create positive experiences for clients and encourage your customers to leave positive reviews on your Google+ profile.

Final Thoughts

Google has made some pretty big changes that affect a lot of businesses and pretty much all of them involve how your business shows up locally to people around you. The changes will most certainly enhance customer search and discovery experiences with a small learning curve for users.

As for businesses, the changes mean a great deal more. It is now imperative that businesses pay attention to the activity and presence on Google+ and those that ignore their Google+ presence do so at their own peril.

Google has been inching towards making local search more social for a while and now has taken a huge leap into that area with this merger. Social media has been playing a large part in business communications for years, but in one day, Google has effectively upped the ante and made it crucial for your business to get in the game.

Recap

3 years ago you may have been one of the guys saying “I can’t believe competitor X is wasting money on THAT…” Today, Google has created another opportunity for you to start fresh and be ahead of the curve. The question is, are you ready?

If you need additional help, feel free to contact our search and social department at social@marketstrong.net or visit our Enterprise Social page.

Forbes.com image galleries lack basic navigation and functionality, and is riddled with unappealing advertising…

-Justin Davis, UX/IA Expert at Madera Labs

Interface Usability, You’re Doing it Wrong

The Forbes Website

First, let me get this off of my chest – I love the Forbes website, but have been bothered by their galleries for some time now, so in an effort to examine why some of the UX problems that are commonly pointed out are not so unique to Forbes, but are in fact a common problem with many ‘print gone digital’ publications, I’ve chosen them as the unfortunate target this month. At first look, you’d think that printed publications were continually raising the bar on bad user experience…

Unfortunately it might not be so simple. Most large publications have historically sold their advertising and positioned against competition based on the antiquated model of measuring “impressions”, or how many times an ad is likely to be viewed.  This makes sense when you are printing a newspaper or magazine, and sending it out to a defined customer base, but what about taking it online?

I’ll be breaking down what the perceived reasoning is behind the poor usability of their image galleries to help you understand what you or your clients may be expecting to hear the next time you explain why impressions don’t mean much. First, let’s run through the Forbes site…

The Good Things: The Main Forbes.com website is actually a great example of where a brand can get a few things right.

• Beautiful layouts, and use of CSS for responsiveness and adaptation to browser size
• Nice use of Mega Nav Menus and good Navigational structure
• Great basic use of Gigya’s platform for creating a relatively seamless experience. (I’m sure this one was a challenge for Gigya to integrate with)

Problems we noted:

• Poorly designed galleries
• Strange ad placements
• No responsive design or effective mobile layout on gallery pages
• Poor load times and design/brand disconnect from main website (overall sense of “is this left over from Geocities?”)
• Author pages are not leveraging Google’s “Rich Snippets”, or connected to G+ (we’re not fanboys, but understand the need very clearly)
• Site is lacking some basic (and important) microdata such as Facebook Open Graph tag altho

UX/IA and ‘Traditional’ Advertising:

Unfortunately for publications that are transitioning thier ‘offline’ sales model to the online world, even subscriber numbers are not an accurate measure of how many actual, targeted customers will see an online ad, and marketers are become savoy enough to know that. The solution has been introduced in the way of “demand-side” ad platforms, which publications are slow to adopt due to the lower cost for the advertiser (At least Forbes is getting smarter about this as you can see above). Not wanting to lose ad revenue,  the obvious solution is to put page views ahead of usability and continue to let your ad space be valued as it always has been, right? Wrong.

How it will Hurt Them

Inadvertently, the entire publishing industry has applied basic “google manipulation” techniques aimed at lowering bounce rates and inflating page views by making the site harder to use. This affects a website negatively in more ways than I can explain in a short UX article, but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that Google is continually pushing to serve the best USABLE content in their search results, and these technics will have an increasingly negative affect on the sites that continue to use them. Apparently, frustrating users everywhere seems to not matter as much as hanging onto a KPI like page views for many traditional publishers (or media buyers for that matter).

Usability isn’t the Only Thing that Counts

Fortunately for Forbes, they employ great writers and search engines are looking closely at social indicators as powerful ranking factors, making all of those likes, tweets, and +1′s count for something. As I mentioned before, I don’t think this will last forever, and as algorithms become more sophisticated, publications not following basic principles of usability will start to lose market share to those that do – it’s only a matter of time. We have faith that as they realize the benefit of increasing click conversions over impression numbers, they’ll all come around.

So congratulations, Forbes.com – you are this month’s poster child for print publications in the category of  ”Online Publishing: You Might be Doing it Wrong“.

“Everybody’s Talking! Are You Listening? How Social Media Technology Brings Online Conversations to You” by Jeffrey Cohen

Jeffrey Cohen's B2B Social Media Book